Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Damien Wenger vs Daniel Cukierman Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wenger vs Cukierman analysis and find out who is favored!
Damien Wenger vs Daniel Cukierman Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wenger has won 51.66% of points on his second serve, while Cukierman has won 48.28%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wenger, in recent form, has won 55.57% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cukierman has won 58.02%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.77% and 36.36% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wenger has saved 52.98% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cukierman has saved 47.54% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wenger has won 63.01% of matches played (W/L 46/ 27), with Cukierman winning 61.9% (W/L 39/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wenger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 242/ 123), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5). Cukierman has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 44/ 28), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Wenger has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.31% of matches (W/L 32/ 17), where as Cukierman has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.54% of matches (W/L 24/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Wenger winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Wenger winning 2 and Cukierman winning 1. The last match between Wenger and Cukierman was at the Kigali 2 Challenger, 08-03-2024, Quarterfinals, Clay with Damien Wenger getting the victory 1-6 6-3 7-6(2).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:23:21.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wenger and Cukierman have played a deciding set 1 times, with Wenger winning 1 times and Cukierman 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Wenger winning 1, and Cukierman 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wenger has played against opponents with an average rank of 263.53 while Cukierman has played against players with an average rank of 240.06.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wenger has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cukierman has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wenger has converted 47.71% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cukierman has converted 45.31% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Wenger 1 - 0 Cukierman
381
Rank
363
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
416
Rank
339
High
28
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
64% (253-140)
Career Total W/L
58% (246-179)
62% (16-10)
YTD W/L
61% (14-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Damien Wenger | Daniel Cukierman |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 14 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:23:21 | 2:23:21 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (60/89) | 65% (62/96) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 62% (37/60) | 65% (40/62) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 66% (19/29) | 47% (16/34) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 57% (4/7) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (40/96) | 37% (33/89) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-6 6-3 7-6(2) |
Stats 
Damien Wenger
Player
Daniel Cukierman
67%
(
60 of
89)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
96)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
9
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Damien Wenger | Daniel Cukierman |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 62% (16/10) | 61% (14/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (34/23) | 61% (33/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (290/243) | 55% (268/218) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 62% (16/10) | 67% (12/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.08 | 0.18 |
| Aces Total | 21 | 44 |
| DFs per game | 0.31 | 0.38 |
| DFs Total | 81 | 90 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:42 | 1:43:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 323.69 | 256.96 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1032/1690) | 63% (921/1472) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (657/1032) | 68% (627/921) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (338/658) | 48% (266/551) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (101/206) | 45% (87/192) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (786/1740) | 44% (719/1617) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 61% (11/7) | 65% (13/7) |
| Futures W/L | 63% (5/3) | 50% (1/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (15/25) | 61% (14/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 43% (3/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 38% (3/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (14/13) | 92% (13/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (14/1) | 8% (13/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (12/3) | 20% (10/2) |
Damien Wenger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Damien Wenger
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
22 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
79%
(
55 of
70)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Rocco Piatti
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
72%
(
26 of
36)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Weis
Player
Damien Wenger
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Niccolo Ciavarella
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
80%
(
48 of
60)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Alexander Klintcharov
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
78%
(
31 of
40)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
60
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Damien Wenger
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Damien Wenger
58%
(
52 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
7
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
49 of
98)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
5-7 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Anton Matusevich
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
44%
(
27 of
62)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Damien Wenger
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Cukierman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Daniel Cukierman
65%
(
72 of
110)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
83)
1
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
2
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
29%
(
11 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
50 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
6-1 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Richard Zusman
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
41%
(
23 of
56)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
10
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gianluca Mager
Player
Daniel Cukierman
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
7
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Mateo Barreiros Reyes
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
90
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Pedro Boscardin Dias
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
7
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Guido Ivan Justo
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
49
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Ignacio Carou
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Daniel Cukierman
80%
(
71 of
89)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Wilson Leite
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Wenger Vs Cukierman Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
